Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godverdomme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - consensus, closed early per WP:SNOW. - KrakatoaKatie 03:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Godverdomme

Godverdomme (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Dictionary definition, already exists on Wiktionary Blair - Speak to me 11:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Note to closer: If this AfD results in the page being deleted, please tag GODVERDOMME MAN! with {{db-r1}}. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 17:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

• Strong keep. "Godverdomme" is a widespread Dutch word which is often used in a derogatory context and there is plenty of information about it to be found, especially from politicians who felt insulted by the word, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Godverdomme (talk • contribs) 11:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Spryde 11:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Spryde above. — Indon (reply) — 11:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary and Wiktionary already has this definition, as well as Wikipedia:Neologisms ^Ariel♥Gold 11:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Ehm, it's not a neologism :) Melsaran (talk) 15:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, dictionary definition, don't think it could be expanded beyond that. Melsaran (talk) 15:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete Per Spryde, Ariel, and nom. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 17:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball delete - perfect example of WP:NOT#DICT. The Evil Spartan 18:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete textbook WP:NOT#DICT. Hut 8.5 19:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.