Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God Found

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] God Found

Self-published nonnotable book, not on Amazon, about 50 Ghits which basically are the author's site and his press releases which he's posted everywhere he can. This article appears to be part of his publicity campaign for the book. NawlinWiki 12:26, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Non-notable. One would have thought The Almighty might have instructed the author on the correct spellings of "existence" and "consistency", as well... :) Tevildo 13:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Optimale ^Gu 14:04, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanispamcruftisement. Attempts to assert notability by associating itself with Bible codes, but there's really no connection there. (And even if there was, it would merit a merge at best.) Powers 14:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. "Lulu Sales Rank: 13,072" - hardly a sign of a seething controversy. — Haeleth Talk 14:05, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete There's something odd going God Found was speedied at authors request earlier today. Dlyons493 Talk 21:17, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

  I guess he wanted to move the page but he didn't notice the move button. --Zoz (t) 14:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per the various aboves. -- Steel 23:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Protect page against recreation. Ifnord 20:30, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Powers. --Zoz (t) 14:53, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Dunno per Jake1973. I've got mixed feelings on this one. I checked out his site and the sample he shows, as I know everyone here has. Ya, Sure there's probably a 99% chance the guy is some kind of nut job, but what if he isn’t? If he is doing the Almighty's work wouldn’t it be best to let it be? I sure wouldn’t want to be the one to delete it. It’s not doing any harm being there, and maybe some good. (There are postings that are far more deserving of deletions than this). It was mentioned that the Author had a few misspellings, but Moses didn’t speak so well. – Something to sleep on before you decide.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jake1973 (talk • contribs) .
  • If he is doing the Almighty's work, the article would be unmaintainable. =) Powers 21:06, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.