Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gobabeb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Current consensus on WP:LOCAL seems to be that proof of existence is sufficient notability for human settlements. Arkyan • ^(talk) 21:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gobabeb

Gobabeb (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The article does not assert notability of the subject per the guidelines of WP:LOCAL. Nv8200p talk 12:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. I see 20,000 Google hits, which is enough for this kind of thing. I suggest moving to Gobabeb, Namibia if it's kept. YechielMan 18:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - It's more like a town as its an isolated settlement that has more people living there than many other towns. For those that care about WP:N or WP:LOCAL, it has been the subject of several articles.[1] [2][3] --Oakshade 21:50, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.