Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gob (album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Philippe 03:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gob (album)

Gob (album) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Per WP:Music: All articles on albums or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines. Individual articles on albums should include independent coverage. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 01:57, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong KeepHow the hell is this not notable for WP:Music??!?!??! it's the very first album by a very notable band. It's okay that you tagged some of the less notable singles with deletion, but this, this is overboard. [The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 20:46, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
• Very Strong Keep, notable album by a very notable band.--JForget 00:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
• Very Strong Keep, exactly what JForget just said. -- WikHead (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.