Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoatSurfing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. Mailer diablo deleted with summary "WP:CSD#G1". James086^Talk 08:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GoatSurfing

GoatSurfing (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:NFT, unverifiable nonsense (author admits he made it up himself), pretty much nonsense superapathyman 03:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Fails WP:V, nonsense. janejellyroll 03:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NFT, WP:PN, WP:NOT#SOAP... the list goes on and on. Krimpet 03:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Comment brilliant!! you guys actually took the trouble to read the page! So basically i need to write a peer reviewed paper on the topic... hmmmm i suppose that shouldnt be too hard. (would a small research article in the Sport be suitable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by MikeSouthgate (talk • contribs)
  • No, someone else would have to write the article and have it appear in a reputable publication. If you write it, it would still be original research. Caknuck 04:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Nonsensical garbage. Jerry lavoie 03:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Nonsense. Possible transwiki to the Uncylopedia (if it isn't already there). Caknuck 04:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per copyvio of this website. Page has been marked for db-copyvio. ju66l3r 04:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• (edit conflict)While the creator of the article asserts copyright, it is not proven in any way...oh, yeah, and it's db-nonsense, too. WP:SNOW (darn, Zahakiel beat me to it)...kill this article please. ju66l3r 04:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - per WP:SNOW in Tibet. ◄Zahakiel► 04:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as vandalism (G3). So tagged. --Dennisthe2 04:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • ...OK, saw the blurb. Make it simple nonsense. So re-tagged. --Dennisthe2 04:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.