Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnosiomania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete by User:Philippe. Non-admin closure. ~Eliz81^(C) 07:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gnosiomania

Gnosiomania (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Dicdef of what appears to be an non notable neologism. Darksun 22:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• speedy delete as it stands his claimed etymology of the word isn't even accurate. I might call this one sentence of gibberish/nonsense.Merkinsmum 23:22, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. CRGreathouse (t | c) 00:37, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.