Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glyda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was speedily deleted ((CSD A7 (non-notable group))). Alphachimp talk 06:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Glyda

Fails WP:MUSIC. (Contested prod). Their albums are not listed on Amazon [1]. The JPStalk to me 00:23, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Article doesn't ascertain any sort of notability (EP's and relationships to Rolling Stones are nn); as such, fails WP:MUSIC hoopydinkConas tá tú? 00:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:MUSIC. There's nothing at amazon.co.uk. There's nothing at allmusic.com, either. -- Mikeblas 01:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)


<extreme personal attack rant removed from here as well - User:Zoe|(talk) 01:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)>--Repmart 01:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: two questions for Repmart:
    • Which record label are Glyda's album and EPs published by? Or are they self-published?
    • Are Glyda currently active? I couldn't tell from their website, most recent release seemed to be 2001? —Stormie 01:08, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment What someone does on ebay has no relevance here. What you think of him/her has no relevance here. What would be relevant would be specific citations to demonstrate this band's notability. If they're not available on amazon (which sells just about everyone's albums, if they're released commercially) and not listed on allmusic, you've got an uphill battle. (BTW, dating Kate Moss doesn't make your band notable. Selling albums makes them notable.) Fan-1967 01:11, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

<personal attack removed from here, too - User:Zoe|(talk) 01:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)>.--Repmart 01:28, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment Forget JPS. Let me repeat: JPS does not matter to the discussion. What matters is the criteria at WP:MUSIC. Read them and explain how Glyda meets those criteria. Because it sure doesn't look like it. Fan-1967 01:46, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

The following three postings were deleted in the recent vandalism. -- H·G (words/works) 03:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. Dionyseus 01:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, Lulu is a known print-on-demand company, so sales on that site don't necessarily meet WP:MUSIC. Unfortunately, I don't see any other way the subject meets that, either--no presence on allmusic, which is usually a pretty good indication, and no major presence on any other major music site that I could find, either. -- H·G (words/works) 01:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment On a note to Repmart, having reviewed your contributions, it looks like most of your work here has been on Jeremy Clarkson, this article, and another for a musician in this article's subject band. If an editor finds a band page that he feels doesn't meet WP:MUSIC, it's not uncommon or uncalled-for for any pages on the band's individual musicians to be considered as well. Please don't take this personally, this is a common occurence. I also encourage you to review WP guidelines on civility and etiquette, as your comment and accusations have been of a highly personal nature. -- H·G (words/works) 01:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

removed rant from blocked user. -- H·G (words/works) 02:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete - non-notable band. Fabricationary 02:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Note

Due to the repeated vandalism of this page by User:Repmart and his various sock puppets, I have sprotected the page. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:36, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.