Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global reality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Global reality

Nomination for deletion Article is vague, contextless and unencyclopedic. Fails WP:V/WP:RS. Concept appears to be related to obscure trance spiritualist medium New Age thinking centered on Jane Roberts as described in Personal reality - but there is no assertion of encyclopedic notability here. The use of a common phrase for this concept makes google check difficult. But there are zero hits for "Global reality" and "Transformational Processing" (a high level term from the website in the article's external link) on google, googlescholar, google books [1] [2][3]. Nothing for "global reality" + "jane roberts" [4][5] on gscholar and gbooks. Only ~125 hits on main google[6]. While I also find it highly questionable, I am not nominating the Personal Reality article at this time as there are much more substantial results from a google search incl. Jane Roberts. The connection between PR and GR also stopped me from prodding. Bwithh 00:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Uninformative and vague. --Mr. Billion 00:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete uh huh. Danny Lilithborne 02:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• If it's a 'hard concept to grasp', it ain't notable or verifiable. This looks like someone trying to understand postmodernism and failing. Delete. Alba 17:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. The article says almost nothing, there are no references and the content is not verifiable. EdJohnston 03:59, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.