This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - no consensus - SimonP 05:27, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Advertismnet- sefl-promotion for a non-notable organization --nixie 22:10, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Pretty good-looking website, but you're right in that the article looks like an ad. Might be a copyvio, but Google comes up nil. Keep and give it a major cleanup and POV-ectomy. - Lucky 6.9 22:24, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Keep, but with reservations. Article needs cleanup and expansion. Megan1967 05:36, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Suspicious-looking dead-end to me. Delete. Edeans 22:01, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, self-promotion. —Korath (Talk) 00:47, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.