The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. --Celestianpowerháblame 10:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Seems like a project of one guy, John Pozzi, who even uses Wikipedia as only reference on his website grb.net. The entry suggests it was seriously considered by the UN, which it was not. Therefore: delete. DocendoDiscimus 19:27, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete. I like that he uses his own article as reference. Nice try. Devotchka 19:50, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
delete interesting mix of original research/vanity/ & copious name-dropping to cover inherent non-notable nature of subject. Pete.Hurd 19:02, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.