Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Gaming HQ
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as failing WP:RS, and therefore WP:V and WP:N. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:13, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Global Gaming HQ
my prod was removed by author so listing here. Lacks sources to establish notability. Seriousspender (talk) 13:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
- This should be kept up because it does establish notability, both with one of GGHQ's sites, RuneHQ, being listed in the RuneScape article, and again, for being listed as the largest site on Alexa. Is Alexa not a credible source? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikuiaku (talk • contribs) 02:39, 1 February 2008 (UTC) — Tikuiaku (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someoneanother 15:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Note: WikiProject Companies has been informed of this ongoing discussion. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It is listed as one of the "major fansites" on Runescape (I thought fansites were against WP:EL???) and doesn't seem to have enough notability for it's own article. Alexa rank is similar to other fansites, but better or worse depending on what you measure, so not notable in that regard. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.