Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glifted

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ifnord 15:26, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Glifted

Non-notable band. --BradBeattie 14:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete and so tagged; band with no claim of notability. NawlinWiki 14:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Oppose Per WP:MUSIC, a band is notable if it "[c]ontains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable." Hum is notable. -Justin (koavf), talk, mail 13:26, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Sam Blanning(talk) 14:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

*Delete on verifiability grounds. Where are the sources? With an appropriate source or two in the article to provide verification, I will gladly change my vote to Keep on notability grounds. Captainktainer * Talk 14:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

    • Withdrawing vote. I can't in good conscience vote keep - I feel the sources are a little too flimsy, and I'm suspicious of the notability of the record label. However, I also can't in good conscience vote delete - the article is' sourced, somewhat, and I'd rather articles be cleaned up and expanded (if possible) than deleted. So, I'll bow out. Captainktainer * Talk 21:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, verified at AllMusic and by their label. - Che Nuevara: Join the Revolution 14:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment The AllMusic link is broken now fixed by Justin (I looked it up anyway; the entry is very sparse), and the information on Wikipedia for Parasol Records is sparse on info. Anyway, this sort of thing should really be in the article. Captainktainer * Talk 19:04, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
      • Updated. Do I have to do EVERYTHING myself? :) PT (s-s-s-s) 20:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - per Che. PT (s-s-s-s) 17:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
    • I have written the nominator asking for a nom withdrawal. PT (s-s-s-s) 17:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep per Justin --Peephole 13:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.