Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glenn Healy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. – Robert 01:20, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Glenn Healy

Whomever started this article obviously detests Glenn Healy, whom I've never heard of. There has to be more to this story and I'm sure there's at least one person out there that likes him. The article is not up to encyclopedic standards and the language used is highly inappropriate. Rlevse 13:13, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:39, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, I removed the attacks and rewrote it since there was a definite claim to notability. - Bobet 15:59, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, Now that someone familiar with hockey who can also be neutral has fixed it, I think the article should stay. Rlevse 19:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. He's on national television several times a week (every day at some points of the year) on TSN, the top sports channel in Canada. Let alone his 15 year NHL career. I've added a couple of little details to the article in passing. -Le Scoopertemp [tk] 20:21, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Well done to Bobet for the rewrite. Capitalistroadster 20:34, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, NHL hockey players like Healy's article should never get deleted, just put a clean-up sticker on it. Croat Canuck 20:53, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, as NHL players are always notable. Carioca 21:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• Strong keep - three cheers for the two people who rewrote the stub, not only for fixing the POV but also for adding concrete information about the former goaltender. 147.70.242.21 22:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.