Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glen Waverley Secondary College

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sr13 08:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Glen Waverley Secondary College

As Schoolcruft. A bad article asserting no notability, no citations or references to reliable sources, or anywhere information can be verified. Thewinchester (talk) 23:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Thewinchester (talk) 23:45, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - very major state school in Melbourne's east. However, the article is an absolute mess (I once had a go at fixing it but it's drifted since), probably needs a complete rewrite to get it to WP standard. Orderinchaos 04:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Article needs extensive surgery and pruning, but the article makes explicit claims of notability, complete with reliables sources. Alansohn 04:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete the content, Keep the article. Sorry, it has been recognised elsewhere that lists of houses are not encyclopedic information nor are the names and positions of junior staff members. But there seems to be a sprinkling of encyclopedic content mixed in with the trivia.Garrie 04:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment How can an article have such a large In the media section and zero references?Garrie 04:22, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Butseriouslyfolks 05:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, plenty of RS were quoted in the article. John Vandenberg 06:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and cleanup. Sources appear to indicate notability but there is extraneous material which needs pruning. Capitalistroadster 07:34, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.