Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glastonbury Hadassah
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Glastonbury Hadassah
The overall organisation is notable, but we do not need an article on each individual branch. Speedy tag removed by article creator as well. Delete. exolon 16:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I was the one who nominated for speedy delete. DesertSky85451 19:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- If you did, that's not in the edit history - I tagged it as speedy myself. exolon 22:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- My bad, you may have beaten me that time. I do encouter edit conflicts an awful lot of the time with my speedy deletes. DesertSky85451 22:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- If you did, that's not in the edit history - I tagged it as speedy myself. exolon 22:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- This branch of Hadassah is not as similar to Hadassah national as other branches are. This is a larger and more together group of Hadassah. While other branches feature a newsletter and other mail, Glastonbury Hadassah has monthly member meetings, community events, and a large website. Wikipedia is a great place to show ourselfs to the public as the large religous community that we are, even though some may not understand. I am unsure as to the correct way to post in this talk page so bear with me. Thank you. User:ncusa367
- Think of Hadassah like a TV Show and glastonbury hadassah like an episode of the show. Hadassah gives general information, while glastonbury hadassah gives more specific information. Adding this information to the hadassah page is like giving information on each episode on the show's page. This way is more ncusa367|ncusa367]] 23:13, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as there is no use of independent sourcing to demonstrate notability at the WP:ORG level. GRBerry 02:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
I agree, feel free to delete this page. i am sory for all the trouble 68.9.114.47 03:01, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.