Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glamorgirl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Glamorgirl, Glamorgirl magazine, GlamorGirl magazine

Previously speedied as advertisement, not improved since recreation Seraphimblade 09:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete looks like a advert for a non notable magazine to me QuiteUnusual 12:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Searching the on-line archive of the San Fernando Valley Business Journal, I can find no mention of this magazine at all, let alone a feature article on it three months ago. Searching elsewhere, the only thing that I can find about this magazine is, ironically, a press release from its founder touting its coverage in the SFVBJ, an article about the distribution of "personal privacy protection cards", and an article about activities at a trade show, both of which latter mention this magazine as an incidental. The only source for information on this magazine is its autobiography. The PNC isn't satisfied. Delete. Uncle G 12:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete. Spam. -- Encyclopaedia Editing Dude 19:02, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Spam, or merge to Dirty Magazines and then delete that. \o/ Elomis 21:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The article was created by User:Richsala, and it says that the magazine's publisher is named Rich Hansen - you figure it out. Note also Glamorgirl magazine and GlamorGirl magazine. GregorB 21:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Uncle G's research. Nothing against pornographic magazines, but they have to show notability like anything else. Also adding Glamorgirl magazine and GlamorGirl magazine, substantially identical articles per GregorB, all of which are created by User:Richsala, and are that user's only contributions. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 15:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.