Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giselle Webber

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete --Ezeu 19:43, 23 May 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Giselle Webber

Delete - not really notable outside of her marginally notable band. Prod removed without explanation. Fails bio requirements. Wickethewok 05:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

That's not a nomination, it's a vote. Since AfD is not a vote, it's helpful to have the nominator take the lead in doing his (or her) best to provide good reasoning for deletion. Nominations can be short, but they really don't need big bolded "delete" notes, nor the phrase "Prod removed without explanation" (Prod can be removed for any reason, by anyone). Cheers, fuddlemark (befuddle me!) 14:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• I am currently compiling a list of Canadian female musicians, which Giselle Webber is included in. She was voted best independent female musician of 2005 by CBC radio 3's Grant Lawrence. Montrealmusic
  • Do you have a verifiable source on this? Also, I'd like to hear some other editors opinions on whether or not that can be considered a notable enough award to qualify for notability. Wickethewok 05:18, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
    • cbc.radio3.ca podcast #31. Montrealmusic
• Delete Nn musician in nn band. Does not meet WP:MUSIC for me. Rockpocket (talk) 06:49, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:MUSIC. Kimchi.sg 09:28, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 10:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable with only 101 Google hits.--Jusjih 14:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The content mentioned by MontrealMusic seems to get her nose over the line of WP:MUSIC. Bucketsofg✐ 15:48, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Provide a reason for deletion first. Kim Bruning 14:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Merge and redirect Band meets WP:BAND so the members do as well. However article is little more that a stub. Merge until material requires fork. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 20:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete the burdon of proof is on the article to show notability, which it simply does not.--Jersey Devil 00:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete My concern about bandcruft relates to guerilla marketing, viral marketing, manipulating WP in attempt to create a "buzz". We complain when Hollywood does it, so we shouldn't allow bands to do it either. Live or die on your own merits (or demerits) as a performing group, say I! ---CH 08:38, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.