Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GirlsandGuns.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No sources to verify the notability of the website. PeaceNT 15:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] GirlsandGuns.com

GirlsandGuns.com (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Fails WP:WEB. Pure spammy advertising (probably a speedy, but I'll put in here in case there is an erudite contribution to feminist firearm culture that I am unaware of). --Legis (talk - contribs) 00:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete: AD. I probably wouldn't have speedied it either. - Rjd0060 00:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. (I too agree. I wouldn't have speedied it.) —Signed by KoЯnfan71 My Talk Sign Here! 01:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep sadly, I have seen this get much media attention. JJL 03:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Interesting. Could you provide links so we can all decide for ourselves? --Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete You guys are nicer than me. This are no real assertions of notability, also probably speedyable as apam.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 03:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam. No reliable independent sources to establish notability. Cap'n Walker 15:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Very cute, but not cute enough for an article. • Lawrence Cohen 16:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  • No Delete.I am the original author of this page. Someone went in and deleted relevant information that informed readers about the relevance of this web-site and its sister web-site RioHeroes.com, which made the entries appear as spam. The original information was informative and no different from the wiki entries about Bodog.net, UFC, and other similar web-based Internet entertainment websites. I am not affliated in any way with the company that produces both web-sites. I am asking you to allow me to fix the entries and leave them on wiki.-- --falvaz75 14:53, 11 October 2007
    • Comment Ive restored the information that was removed, so people can judge it for themselves. I've also removed the {{hangon}} tag which applies only to Speedy deletion. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 20:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, should have been speedied. No notability, no independent sources to prove that it has any notability. Falvaz, I went back to look at the version you created, and the links to CBS News and the Miami Herald were to articles about the cock fighting site, not the girlsandguns site, so it's no wonder they were removed. You still haven't provided any reliable sources for this site. Corvus cornix 20:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.