The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Deleted by Sarah Ewart (A7) - Yomanganitalk 09:40, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Not notable, probable vanity article, little information, but too serious-looking for a speedy delete. Djcartwright 05:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Actually, looks like an attempted userpage? 05:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, second update: it's been edited from minimalistic to just plain vanity, even with bad grammar.Djcartwright 05:38, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.