Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girard Tecson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.

[edit] Girard Tecson

Girard Tecson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Only assersion of notability ("Critically acclaimed") is completely unverified, and verification was not provided before prod was removed, so I'm nominating for deletion i kan reed 08:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Strong delete- fails WP:BIO, WP:V, 452 google hits and his show's "site" is a myspace. Enough said, really-from K37 08:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Uber delete. Seems self written: "Girard is currently in love with Jing, and hope she feels the same way. She puts a smile in his face. Her presence makes his day brighter and his feelings towards her grows ever stronger ... In school and in the privacy of his home, they shared very intemate moments. Even in Biology, the professor asked them to separate because they always showed their affection toward one another during lectures." heh --frothT 08:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable  Tuvok^Talk|Desk|Contribs  09:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • delete surely this ought to be speediable, no claim of notability, CSD A7. Pete.Hurd 17:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment I felt the same way, but being "critically acclaimed" as was stated in at least one version of the article, does meet WP:BIO, I'm just incredulous as to the truth of the matter since there are no refrences. i kan reed 18:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete- completely non-notable. Turgidson 18:17, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Very strong delete- not notable, vanity page. --queso man 21:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.