Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girafa 2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Girafa

Advertisement. Alexa rank of Girafa.com is around 100,000. Looks mostly like an excuse for someone to post a referral link. FreplySpang (talk) 17:17, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment - earlier today, this actually was a copy of Thumbshot. I speedied, and it reappeared in its current form as an advertisement. Googling doesn't turn up a full copyvio, and I thought it would be appropriate to discuss it. FreplySpang (talk) 17:20, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete. The entire purpose of it is to post links for spam. 213.8.83.40 and 206.47.220.198 are edit-warring over spam to this site. Bart133(talk)
  • Delete The anonymous user who deleted Bart133's comment is currently spamming links to it. Jasmol 07:10, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam and posted by the same users who keep inserted the same spam link into Thumbnail and Screenshot and who knows whereelse. Peyna 13:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
    I do! Thumbshot is the other favored target. FreplySpang (talk) 14:18, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
    In that case, I also vote to block all of the IPs that are creating these articles and inserting this link spam. Looking at their edit histories, that is all they have done. Peyna 13:30, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete and protect previously speedied spam per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girafa - and not that long ago either. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
    The current content is not the same as the speedied article from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girafa - that was speedied as a copy of Thumbshot. FreplySpang (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.