Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni picarazzi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Lara❤Love 14:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Giovanni picarazzi

Giovanni picarazzi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable pro wrestler in a minor independent promotion. Judging by the article creator's username, it looks like self-promotion. Title is badly capitalized, to boot. — Gwalla | Talk 23:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Yes, let's delete it because of the poor title formatting. Also because this professional wrestler only gets 54 ghits and most of tose appear to be YouTube. Fails WP:BIO Delicious carbuncle (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. —— Gwalla | Talk 23:43, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - no reliable sources appear to exist, and fails WP:BIO. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:52, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity article; only mentions found through search engines are youtube, myspace, etc. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:21, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable and possible vanity article. Nikki311 22:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, This article fails at the internet. AndarielHalo (talk) 23:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable and likely vanity. --ZimZalaBim ^talk 02:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• DELETE The article says: "Soon Giovanni will be wrestling for World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) as he is headed for an interview towards the end of this year, in Stamford, CT.". Most likely self-made. --sonicKAI (talk) 11:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete horrible article not to mention likely self-promotion.Freebird Jackson (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - fails WP:N, only references on ghits are youtube, myspace. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Keep but needs serious re-write I have heard of this person. Not a hoax. Badly written prose is not a criteria for deletion according to the rules. JerryVanF (talk) 06:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Comment: The real issue is that there are no reliable sources referenced in this article to backup any of the facts in the article. Take a look at WP:BIO#Basic criteria, if you can find sources you can edit the article to add them. --Captain-tucker (talk) 09:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per the nom and all reason stated above, not notable in the least. Darrenhusted (talk) 09:22, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.