Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gimmickry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. --Titoxd^(?!?) 04:35, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gimmickry

Appears to be neologism. The term gimmickry has 200k hits but impossible to distinguish relevant link. Term "gimmickry movement" only has 13 hits from google and only one not in wikipedia and its mirrors. SYSS Mouse 01:40, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Vanity article, creator of this article actually has a wikilink unto himself, in the same article, (ie User:Levin Dean) Also not notable. -- Malo 05:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Vanity. There is no evidence that any such movement actually exists, and the topic itself appears to be non-notable nonsense. TheMadBaron 15:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• Perhaps it can be redirected to Gimmick? - Mgm|^(talk) 19:49, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as vanity or original research. --TantalumTelluride 22:11, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.