The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:17, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Unnotable vanity; unencyclopedic DanielCD 15:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Speedy delete, meaningless to most readers, and possibly nonsense.Bjones 15:18, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Latinus 19:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.