Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gilbert Ott III

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Wknight94 (talk) 15:11, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Gilbert Ott III

what more source could be provided, imcluded is link to label website, articles surrounding projects, etc.

Gilbert Ott III (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seemingly non-notable biography. Originally tagged with a simple {{notability}} but this was removed twice by an anon with no explanation or alteration. Sources barely acceptable if at all. tomasz. 18:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

  • tomasz, what can be done to satisfy in your eyes? ample information has been added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.41.249 (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak delete The refs are to his own record company's website, to myspace and to a website which I cannot determine whether is an "independent and reliable" source with respect to our notability standards. Absolutepunk? Others may be more familiar with it. Find sources such as Billboard. Edison (talk) 16:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete The only "independent" sources listed are actually press releases, and even those only mention Gilbert Ott in passing. Gsearch not coming up with anything showing notability.--Fabrictramp (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Additional comment Gilbert Ott III (Gib) was essentially the same article as this, and was deleted as a result of this AfD.--Fabrictramp (talk) 22:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.