Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gidrophonick

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. – ABCD 01:24, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gidrophonick

I wish the article would say what "Gidrophonick" means, since I have never heard of that word. Nor apparently has Google. Neologism? Testpage? Delete. Sjakkalle 10:58, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• This is a copy of "Referrer log spamming" from our page spamdexing. The external link seems to be an attempt to do some spamdexing courtesy of wikipedia users. I think there must be a speedy criterion for this, otherwise just delete it. Kappa 11:55, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Delete! Sockster 14:14, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Vote by a self described sock-puppet. Must sadly be disregarded. Sjakkalle 14:21, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.