Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghubowski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Babajobu 04:08, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ghubowski

• Keep. Popular company in Champaign-Urbana (IL), just because you didn't hear of it doesn't mean its not notable.--Jghuman2 21:48, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Long time resident of Champaign. I gotta say, you playa-hatas have got to show some respect to a Midwest (well just Champaign-Urbana) based company that has reached cult following status.--Lez Zeppelin 17:36, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

  Note Lez Zeppelin's first edit. --M@thwiz2020 23:38, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

  Note Mathwiz2020's 3073rd edit. --Lez Zeppelin

• Not notable firm. Spam. Delete abakharev 05:49, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If this is their website, then this meets the criteria for WP:VSCA. --Kinu 05:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanispamcruftisement. Royboycrashfan 05:53, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Patently non-notable. Self-promotion/advertising as well. --Fuhghettaboutit 05:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Spam, advertisment, & non-notable wrapped up all in one delete-worthy package. --Wingsandsword 08:10, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, advertising. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 12:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Advertising Avi 18:32, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as ads.Blnguyen 02:02, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Notable. --Siva1979^{Talk to me}15:27, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.