Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghosts of Modern Man

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per improvements made by DoubleBlue which lets article meet criterion 1 of the WP:MUSIC guideline "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable". This addresses the opinions of non-notability of those who earlier argued for deletion . Davewild (talk) 22:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ghosts of Modern Man

Ghosts of Modern Man (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete only one album on a label, fails WP:MUSIC Carlossuarez46 (talk) 06:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletions. -- A. B. ^(talk) 12:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I could be convinced to say "keep" if better references (not just Myspace) could be found, especially to establish notability of the album. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:54, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, and it looks like the original article was written by the label itself. I didn't see reference to another album. If the article survives, the reference to an upcoming album in 2006 should be removed. Xymmax (talk) 20:03, 11 December 2007 (UTC) N.B. Nevermind, I just did it now.
• Keep. Winnipeg SunChartAttackVueBeatRouteChartAttack CD reviewExclaim CD review2007 Saskatchewan Recording Industry Association compilationChartAttack discussion of 2008 albumGoMM at Canadiam Music Week reviewCBC Radio 3 recording sessionThe ConcordianCarillon CD reviewGauntlet interviewGauntlet CD review + evidence of several national tours DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:35, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Nicely done, DoubleBlue! (No one else had done a Google search?) The university newspaper articles are usually, on their own, not enough to establish notability, but the reviews and articles in national music magazines such as Exclaim! and Chart, along with the Winnipeg Sun are more than enough for a keep. --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - as per sources found by User:DoubleBlue -- Whpq (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per sources. Bearcat (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Only one album. Notability not established. HelenWatt (talk) 04:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.