Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghosting (sport)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted as a recreation of previously deleted material. -- Longhair\^talk 06:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ghosting (sport)

Ghosting (sport) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

a comedy bit referenced only in a blog is hardly notable. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:04, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete - I csd'd this once. Chrislk02 ^{Chris Kreider} 17:11, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete' (edit conflict) I also tagged this; is not even a sport according to the reference, its more like a comedy [1]. Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 17:13, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete sole reference is a blog. Creator has removed the AfD tag at least once. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 17:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete; no independent reliable sources.--Prosfilaes (talk) 17:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy delete Been CSD'd twice already in 24 hours, delete and salt the thing. treelo _talk 18:54, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

• Keep: Seen on TV. Only better references are needed.Hellno2 (talk) 19:49, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - "seen on TV" doesn't mean "notable" automatically. "Seen in multiple reliable sources that are actually focused on the topic at hand" is more notable. I didn't turn anything of substance up. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:14, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete I was seen on TV three times. :) Fails the WP:GNG; no independent or reliable sources and thus WP:V. PeterSymonds (talk) 20:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to stalking, because that's what you're likely to be accused of if you try this; and that's only if you don't get your ass kicked first. Mandsford (talk) 01:34, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Longhair\^talk 06:35, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.