Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghostfence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete (unanimous) --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:59, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ghostfence

Ghostfence (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article asserts no notability through reliable sources, and as such is just an in-universe repetition of plot elements from the Elder Scrolls games. As Wikipedia is not a gameguide, and this is all duplicative, this can be safely deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 18:39, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. They really ought to make a video game encyclopedia for all these articles, there's too many on wikipedia. -RiverHockey (talk) 20:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable. No sources. —dv82matt 12:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Someone another (talk) 23:32, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 12:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No out-of-universe perspective, no real-world notability. Does not meet the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Pagrashtak 15:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N, WP:FICT, etc. Fin©™ 17:37, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.