Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghost in the machine (technology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 19:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ghost in the machine (technology)

Dicdef article, not written well and does not differentiate between fact and fiction.--Zxcvbnm 02:14, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. AdamBiswanger1 02:43, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, seems to be original research amd neologism--TBCTaLk?!? 03:05, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. and shouldn't it be Ghosts? ILovePlankton 04:28, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:OR -- Koffieyahoo 05:20, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat 05:25, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom --Alphachimp ^talk 06:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --->|Newyorktimescrossword 20:48, 21 June 2006 (UTC)|
• Keep as it's used in several cyberpunk (and similar) works of fiction. Some of them are mentioned in the article. I do agree that the article definitely needs to be expanded quite a bit. If people want to hold off on the delete-fest, I'll be happy to see what I can do with it. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:05, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 03:17, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep I can see how this can be expanded to be useful, but seems to be quite vulnerable to WP:OR. - Wickning1 14:31, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.