The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was NO CONSENSUS Gah, it should probably have been speedied in the first place. -Doc 16:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
Clearly a vanity article. Shruth 18:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Cleaned up, therefore STRONG KEEPZlatkoT 15:35, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.