The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:32, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
non-notable, no context, POV, unencyclopedic. prod was removed without explanation. --DrTorstenHenning 12:19, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete Fails WP:WEB then, and even more now. "was a short-lived gfx site which experienced sucsess in mid 2005 to early 2006", "Mid 2005 is considered as the prime of Gfx Sector with more than 800 members." --Porqin 12:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete Nobody in their right mind would expect to find this in an encyclopaedia ben 12:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.