Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgie Thompson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nominator withdrew his request. ~ Riana ⁂ 16:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Georgie Thompson

Georgie Thompson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

She's just another journalist, making her non-notable. The only notability is FHM's list. I'm not sure if that alone makes her qualify WP:N. -xC- 09:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Sufficient notability and independent coverage.--Michig (talk) 10:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. She's notable for being one of the main presenters, on the biggest sports news show in the country, and the FHM thing. Sunderland06  12:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Sorry, I didn't know how this works. Just for knowledge, why are presenters of news shows notable too? Thanks for explaining,-xC- 12:20, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
    • Nobody is notable just for having a particular job, but, to quote WP:N, "Substantive coverage in reliable sources suggests that the subject is notable."--Michig (talk) 12:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, almost a speedy keep. Notable enough.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep definitely notable. Jonathan (talk • contribs • complain?) 16:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.