Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgia right to life

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 18:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Georgia right to life

Georgia right to life (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable organization. State organizations are rarely notable in their own rights. Corvus cornix 23:04, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Merge - We have New York State Right to Life Party and Colorado Right to Life articles too. I'm not sure if we have any others, but I didn't see them in my quick search. These could all be merged into Right to life or National Right to Life Committee if they are in fact affiliated state-level groups. Torc2 00:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I had a long explanation that got lost. *sigh* Server overload, I think. I follow Torc2's reasoning but I think merging would give too much prominence to one or two state chapters over the rest of the state chapters. If there were WP:RS to substantiate the info, maybe. But delete seems the proper course to me. Pigman 01:41, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I considered the notability issue before creating the article, as I could see Torc2's point for many state affiliates. However GRTL is starting to cause national debate over their amendment, and has made news in Townhall.com, InsiderAdvantage, WorldNetDaily.com and others. The public scrutiny is only going to increase, thus I thought a wikipedia article would be appropriate. This state is what the pro-life debate will be about over the next year or more. Josh brahm 12:36, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:ORG. Stifle (talk) 19:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.