Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George e. woodberry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:21, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] George e. woodberry

Doesn not provide claims of notability, nn-bio tag was removed, bringing to AfD. brenneman(t)(c) 05:40, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete , but not speedy. (We need to give the author a chance to finish it first, since it's bollocks-in-progress.  ;) ) Jamie (talk/contribs) 06:02, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete -- it looks like a newbie's first attempt at a user page that somehow escapted into the namespace for articles. Endomion 06:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete all users contributions elsewhere have been vandalism... I think that means we can write this off as a nn-bio and speedy it.  ALKIVAR™ 07:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, per reasoning provided by nominator and Alkivar, this should qualify I think. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 16:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • delete as per nom. Jporcaro 21:21, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and put a cleanup tag on it. Many google results [1] he wrote the books Nathaniel Hawthorne (which is at project gutenberg [2]), The Life of Edgar Allan Poe and Criticisms and Interpretations, and he's quoted at several sites for famous people quotations.[3] -- Astrokey44|talk 23:17, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
On second thoughts redirect to George Edward Woodberry -- Astrokey44|talk 23:29, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete nn-bio. Stifle 13:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.