Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Stamatis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowballed --Doc^g 20:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] George Stamatis

George Stamatis (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

As it stands this is a promotional puff piece with serious conflict-of-interest problems. Should there be a Wikipedia article about this person at all? TS 20:52, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Sources such as this are very dubious. Puff piece with NPOV and COI problems, fails WP:BIO as far as I can see. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 20:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete nothing worthwhile here.--Doc^g 21:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete , no evidence of notability -- puff!notable Travellingcari (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• No Delete No reason for it to be deleted. There is no problem other then one person with IP 70.109.223.188. Read history since the beginning and you will understand. Read 70.109.223.188 talk page also where other people are blaming him for knowing what he is doing on Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.131.70.246 (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete As far as I can tell, none of the sources in the article indicate that the subject of this biography meets WP:BIO. Whether it's relevant or not, it appears quite likely that User:Robertogonzalez, User:142.131.70.246, User:76.68.205.123, User:72.47.216.108 and blocked user User:74.13.200.74 are all the same individual who has a vested interest in the subject. Deli nk (talk) 21:46, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination and other comments above. --72.209.11.186 (talk) 22:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Snowball Delete as vanispamcruftisement. Thinboy00 @997, i.e. 22:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Vanity, thy name is Stamatis. Herostratus (talk) 04:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete and salt to prevent recreation. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 16:18, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable Kernel Saunters (talk) 16:48, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Self-promotion. --John (talk) 17:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.