Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Hills

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete.  Denelson83  02:25, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] George Hills

Not a notable person Akamad 03:04, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Being related to notability does not confer notability. Keryst 03:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete was basically going to say what Keryst said. --W.marsh 03:20, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non notable. utcursch | talk 04:13, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete no claim of notability jnothman ^talk 04:41, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and speedy as zero claim to notability. Just zis Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 14:26, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, go through 'whatlinkshere' and remove redlinks to prevent any temptation of recreation. I'm surprised there isn't a range of hills called the George Hills anywhere. Proto t c 15:05, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:Bio. HGB 01:16, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, as per nominator. --Me or a Robin 10:23, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.