Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Hagman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 01:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] George Hagman
Non-notable psychologist, entry reads like vanity article/resume. While the article claims four published journal articles as greatest claim to fame, I have my doubts about that being enough to establish notability. While the subject is active in the field, he appears to be a typical, or marginally more prominent than typical, psychologist. Incidentally, a Google search for the name turns up 667 hits, most of which are for a presumably different George Hagman who wrote a book not listed in this entry. Wingsandsword 12:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The other psychologist named George Hagman appears to be somewhat better known, but probably neither of them belong in Wikipedia. Brianyoumans 17:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. As written, individual fails notability requirements. -- MarcoTolo 22:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. In addition, these poorly written, embarrassingly self-promoting autobiographies always make me cringe. I think we need a WP:NoCringe policy established. --RandomHumanoid(⇒) 15:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per RHumanoid Bulldog123 04:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.