Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George H. Philip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by Lectonar. Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 15:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] George H. Philip

George H. Philip (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable teacher. Fails WP:BIO by any conceivable definition. Possible vanity page / WP:COI / WP:OR violation.

• Delete. This doesn't seem on the face of it like the individual could ever meet WP:BIO and zero Google hits outside of Wikipedia confirmed it. Strangely enough, there's a US warship with that name. Accounting4Taste 01:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and Accounting4Taste. If there was an article for every teacher on the face of the planet...whoa. —Signed by KoЯnfan71 ^{My Talk} _{Sign Here!} 01:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:PROF and WP:BIO. Not sure whether to speedy. The article looks like a 95% copy of its source.--Sethacus 02:43, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, I don't see any assertion of notability. Nyttend 02:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per A7 - doesn't assert the significance of the subject. Tagged as such. Ale_Jrb^talk 12:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per A7, utterly non-notable, unencyclopedic bio. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.