Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Fellows
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was conditional and slight merges indicate overall lack of notability; other keep comment indicates temporal notability, which shouldn't be the case for an encyclopedia article; only delete voter makes loads of sense => delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:10, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] George Fellows
Bio of non-notable. Though he is candidate for governor of California, Google News search has zero hits. Only a few Google hits - for sites listing candidates names. WP:NOT for self-promotion/advertising/campaigning. —ERcheck @ 04:12, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
-
- Probably not a good idea as all the other names in that article are links to other articles. —gorgan_almighty 15:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Keep & Cleanup. If he's a candidate for Governor of California then he's notable, at least until the elections are over. Remove NN content (there is a lot) then stubify. —gorgan_almighty 15:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
- Conditional merge. If this guy meets the signature or deposit requirements to get on the November ballot, he should have his own (cleaned-up) article. If he's running as a write-in, he deserves only a mention on California gubernatorial election, 2006. -- Mwalcoff 00:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Independent candidates for Governor of California need only 150 signatures or $3,500 to get on the ballot. Being able to do that does not make you worthy of an encyclopedia article. Peyna 03:51, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.