Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geoffrey McCabe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Bucketsofg 20:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Geoffrey McCabe

Geoffrey McCabe (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Possible non notable person, asserts some notability but gives, but provides no sources. Notability tag has been up for 8 months. Daniel J. Leivick 23:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Even if sources are found for the notability claims, this page is a copy-paste of geoffreymccabe.com/Bio.htm. Dr bab 00:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC).
• Speedy Delete as copyvio per Dr. Bab. (note:I removed the prod.) Chubbles 00:26, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as no sources indicating notability were found with a search of Google News Archive. allmusic has a couple of his records listed but no bio and only one outside credit, casting doubt on some of the article's claims. --Dhartung | Talk 09:58, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and start over. All those red tags and typos, gosh. Bearian 19:55, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Agree with Bearian. Needs total rewrite in order to be decent. MKoltnow 03:42, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - copyvio even if it is notable. Anonymous Dissident^Talk 05:33, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• he seems to be notable-ish, a bit. This is a line call, but, delete per Bearian.. Kripto 10:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 13:58, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.