Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genophilia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Genophilia

Genophilia (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unreferenced article on a non-notable neologism. May be original research. Contested prod. MER-C 05:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Wryspy 05:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete Apparently coined for use only in one book. Possibly keep if it can be shown to be in wider use. (The article does discuss the concept, so it is more than a dicdef, but it seems NN on the present evidence.DGG 09:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Already transwikied. Sr13 (T|C) ^ER 10:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above, transwikied. --Phoenix (talk) 21:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
• Transwikied -> delete. Coren 00:54, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.