Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genevieve Cano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Genevieve Cano
- Speedy Delete A7, and Not exactly a quality article.--AeomMai 23:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just a note I couldnt finish the nomination due to an error that didnt let me complete it--AeomMai 20:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not an A7 candidate. However, she is a non-notable losing contestant, which warrants a regular deletion. MER-C 13:36, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable: high school teacher and administrator; Glendoremus 18:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete via WP:BIO and/or WP:PROF. SkierRMH 02:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Save - notable; although she did not win the Miss Latin America Competition, she WAS the Miss Spain, therefore considering it to be a win. Perhaps a deletion of the high school section would be appropriate. Tingalex 16:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Point to Note: The above is a grade nine student at ACS and has often admitted to having a crush on Genevieve Cano. At one point he recited his dream about her for a french project.--AeomMai 20:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Excuse me: Excuse me AeomMai, but that information is NOT true and is NOT relevant to the contant of the article. I would not support keeping an article on a high school teacher. The article exists because of her beauty pageant winnings. It is NOT appropriate to post information about my school work on wikipedia; you are defeating the purpose. Tingalex 15:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's not what I'm trying to say. You are clearly a biased individual. Your opinion is biased and therefore not relevant in this article.--AeomMai 16:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Then you could be considered to be biased as well because you are her student. I suppose that somebody who writes an article on a political party would be biased because they have politcal views. Somebody who writes an article on a celebrity would be biased because they didn't like a movie they were in.....Tingalex 22:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's not what I'm trying to say. You are clearly a biased individual. Your opinion is biased and therefore not relevant in this article.--AeomMai 16:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Excuse me: Excuse me AeomMai, but that information is NOT true and is NOT relevant to the contant of the article. I would not support keeping an article on a high school teacher. The article exists because of her beauty pageant winnings. It is NOT appropriate to post information about my school work on wikipedia; you are defeating the purpose. Tingalex 15:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
-
- Delete not notable and unlikely to have any WP:RS. And could the above two editors kindly keep their bickering to the schoolyard. --Richmeistertalk 18:25, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - My grade 12 french teacher is not notable. she's nice and very patient, and i don't mean to sound mean, but she has not done anything to even warrant being in the Windsor Star. Mention her on the Assumption High School page, with her photograph, though. :) The Legendary Raccoon Fox: RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 05:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.