The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 15:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Is an irrelevant article, does not assert the importance of the subject. I am renowned for citing WP:NOT, but I guess I'll have to do it again. haz (user talk) 16:00, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete. A load of Google hits on this, but the book this term comes from does not seem to be particularily popular or significant. Sjakkalle(Check!) 08:35, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.