Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General stone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:35, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] General stone

• Delete. non-notable band without even a single record released. Rmhermen 00:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Not true, re-read the post. Band has several demos released and will be putting out first album shortly. May not be nn world-wide but is picking up steam in Canada.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cscarsbrook (talk • contribs) .

"Picking up steam" doesn't really cut it. See WP:NMG. PJM 12:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Demos are not albums. If the album is yet to be released, it fails WP:MUSIC and the crystal ball. --Kinu 01:43, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable band. Bad ideas 01:58, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kinu. Royboycrashfan 02:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete "up and coming " are the operative words. Maybe in the future this band will gain notabilty. But then again can't the same be said of hundreds of bands out there? --† Ðy§ep§ion † 03:46, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• delete per Kinu J\/\/estbrook Talk VSCA  04:15, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. what is considered notable then? these guys are big in this part of Canada. is that not notable in Winnipeg? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cscarsbrook (talk • contribs) .

Again, see WP:NMG. PJM 12:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• delete What is notable in Winnipeg is not always notable in Wikipedia. Pschemp | ^Talk 06:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The minimum number of charting album/single releases that a band must release in order to qualify as notable is two. One demo release is insufficient. WP:Music refers.  (aeropagitica)  07:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

That's a common misconception. The two album thing is only one of the criteria by which band notability is rated. If they have meet multiple of the other guidelines at WP:NMG they can still be notable. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:51, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable band. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 10:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NMG. Not even close. PJM 12:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Avi 16:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Ardenn 21:29, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Only the band members and maybe their mothers would look at this thing. --Thunder 21:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NMG. The only criterion that looks like could be met is being covered in the national press... which when Googling I saw no indication of. Treznor 21:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NMG. Essexmutant 10:15, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable band. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-02-08 15:54Z

• Delete. Resubmit entry once this band has released an album. --Dogbreathcanada 02:21, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable band. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 13:23, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.