Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Electric CFE738

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. —Wknight94 (talk) 04:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] General Electric CFE738

General_Electric_CFE738 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) -- (View AfD)

• Note: the nominator, User:Burbank, didn't offer a reason for nominating this article. Akradecki 20:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• I'm not the creator of the original article, but I saw it needed a bit of cleanup so I pitched in. I take it this deletion is the result of an article rename? According to this General Electric page the engine is referred to as the "GE/AlliedSignal CFE738" Itsfullofstars 19:36, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as there is no initial reason offered for deletion, and it is standard practice to have an article on each model of jet engine. Akradecki 20:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Comment After doing some checking, it seems that there are two articles, this one and CFE CFE738. As there is no company called "CFE" (as there is with CFM International), it seems to me that that article should be the one eliminated. Yes, I understand that the CFE738 is a partnership between GE and Honeywell, but since GE is taking the lead in the marketing of it, I believe that the title should properly be that of this article. Therefore, I propose that this article be kept, and that the other article be redirected here. Akradecki 20:55, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

• Oppose This article and CFE CFE738 were created one day apart by the same user, User:Burbank. This is not the proper way to rename an article. However, given that the 2 pages are only one day apart, and the edits so far not that significant, discussion should be held on which title to keep the article on, and the other page converted to a redirect. - BillCJ 21:12, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Note to closing admin: please take into consideration this discussion regarding merging the two articles. Akradecki 02:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 16:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Georgewilliamherbert 01:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• DeleteAccording to http://www.geae.com/engines/corporate/cfe738.html there is a joint company called CFE (GE plus Honeywell) that manufactures the CFE738. I only realised this, after I created the General Electric CFE738 article. I then created the CFE CFE738 article as a replacement!User:Burbank 17.02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

• Comment What you have done is essentially to move the page, but this is not the way to do it. Even if the article remains on the other page, General Electric CFE738 should remain as a redirect to CFE CFE738. But is a different issue, and is currently being discussed on Talk:General Electric CFE738. - BillCJ 17:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - On paper there might be a company called CFE, but if you read the reference provided, the "CFE" company isn't doing the work, GE and Honeywell are, and since GE manages the core, that makes it a GE core, meaning this is a GE article. Akradecki 17:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.