Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazeebow Unit (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and salt. — TKD::Talk 12:38, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gazeebow Unit

Gazeebow Unit (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

procedural nomination This article has been deleted and recreated so many times it's close to amazing. Back in Jan 2006 it was deleted via AFD as non-notable and a Deletion Review in Aug 2006 upheld this. Since then very little has changed, except that there is now some media mention that might or might not raise the group above the notability threshold. This AFD comes from conversion of a PROD; shall we put the article to rest and salt the earth over it? User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete, unless some serious claims of notability can be established. -R. fiend 05:00, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete and salt. We've trod this ground before and nothing has changed. Realkyhick 05:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Delete and salt borderline speedy, fails WP:MUSIC by miles. No label, no records (not even self-released ones!), the first two links don't work, only working link is to MySpace, where they have 34 friends(!). Spectacularly non-notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 10:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete As per above. Not notable. I can't see any reason to retain this article. Pursey 12:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.