Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay sitges

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gay sitges

Gay sitges (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
  • Delete. Article is written exclusively as an (original research) travel guide, which seems to be an invalid use of wikipedia as an "<insert demographic here> guide to travel". I don't see any reason for this to exist as a separate article from the one on the Spanish city Sitges- if there's anything sourced and notable enough it should be mentioned/merged to the main article, and not exist as a fork. (Note I'd feel the same if the article were called Nightclubber's Sitges or Trainspotter's Sitges- the intended audience is irrelevant.) cjllw | TALK 02:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Obvious case of Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Part Deux 03:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete We're not a travel guide or a place where you can create articles in order to have a big fat section of external commercial links. Pascal.Tesson 03:48, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, though maybe beforehand a very small part of the content could be merged into sitges. Mathmo Talk 05:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, unencyclopedic. Roamingk (talk · contribs) should be make aware of WikiTravel. --Dhartung | Talk 08:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete WP:NOT. Jefferson Anderson 16:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge any appropriate content to Sitges. Having visited the town, I can tell you that the current single paragraph about gay tourism isn't nearly enough: it's an important part of the town's atmosphere. JulesH 19:11, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.