Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay rights in Chad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gay rights in Chad

Absolutely no content whatsoever. KI 00:32, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. I see content. I also see Category:Gay rights by country where there are roughly 60 articles on the same topic. Chad is a country and gay rights are as important there as anywhere else. If the nom feels that content is lacking, the proper solution, in my opinion, would be to add content to the site, and to this article in particular. Removing content is the wrong way to address the problem. -- JJay 01:03, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Removing content? What's to remove? KI 02:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. It is a stub, but has content. The subject is important.Wuzzy 02:00, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

You simply aren't looking at any other "Gay rights in [insert African country]" that has the same formatting as Gay rights in Chad. There are no facts in this article. All that it is is formating. KI 02:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep Right now it's almost like starting an article on the Twenty-eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution just to say "There is no Twenty-eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution at this time (June 2005)" but this can probably be expanded to explain why. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 02:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. There was some content when the article was AfDed (albeit unreferenced) and there's even more since then, with a reference. Topic seems notable. --Craig Stuntz 03:25, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Golfcam 03:31, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. The content currently in the article refers to Ghana not Chad. If it is rewritten about Chad, I would vote to keep. At the moment, I would vote to delete. Capitalistroadster 05:06, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
  • If you are refering to the footnote to an article titled "Ghana," if you follow the link the page is actually about Chad. Crypticfirefly 05:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Crypticfirefly 05:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as is, it says Homosexuals are not mentioned in law, homosexuality is not talked about and....................thats it!! Jcuk 08:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Yes, and this is information and could be information someone would want. A + B =/= C here. --DanielCD 20:09, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per JJay. This is a perfectly acceptable stub; there is ample precedent. Humansdorpie 13:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletions. -- Humansdorpie 13:39, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I see content, too. FloNight 13:41, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep there's content. Carlossuarez46 18:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Has the potential to be a piece of a larger grouping of articles that can be a strong source of information. As there's already some potentially useful info here, I say keep. --DanielCD 20:06, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.